Conflict Management Essay

Websters defines action as To come into bang be in mutual opposition (274). If you wanted to choose an memorial t suitablet to study involvement in, you would have to look no further than the multitude. The military has no single uprise to conflict c be. There are overly many individual personalities within a multitude of internal strategys to be able to singularize the conflict. It is often the case that the conflict you are having was caused by a outline put into place by someone removed your organization. It could be as simple as the cause and effect syndrome.For example, if the 335th anterior nutriment Battalion (FSB) commander put a policy in place, that his battalion would perform mandatory proficiency training on impact Department of the Army Form 2406 on Mondays this would cause his leaders to impede the shops in order to conduct this training. While on the other(a) hand, the 1-5th understructure Battalion commander put in place a policy that his battalion w ould perform equipment maintenance on Mondays. His battalions leaders would have a conflict because if they had equipment that needed to be turned in, they would non be able to do so. The FSBs shops would be closed due to their training.Inadvertently, these two battalion commanders have caused a system conflict. This type of conflict happens rather often in the military because these commanders are rattling goal oriented except fail to take into account the conflicts that whitethorn arise from the system that he but emplaced. It would now fall on the battalions Executive ships officer to negotiate a win-win solution to this conflict in a really rapid manner. Without a win-win solution, there would be a visible conflict that would eventually gravel apparent to the hierarchy and a solution whitethorn be imposed that might not be favorable to both(prenominal) parties involved. The driving force for the resolution of this conflict would be not allowing the conflict to reach th e boss.I work in the Division provide which often task or gives directives to the Divisions Main Support Commands (MSCs). These task or directives often cause swell pain in the MSCs. This is a perfect example of a win-loseconflict. The MSCs can submit a declination of tasking, but they often are directed to do the tasking anyway. In essence, these tasks are plan of attack straight from the General himself and cannot be simply dismissed. At this point it has become an authoritative command to do the tasking. An example of this situation would be a battalion that has been over tasked beyond its physical means. This battalion has been tasked to supply to a greater extent personnel than it physically possesses. The problem may be that all the other battalions are in the same boat. The battalion has to adapt and be productive in order to meet to end goal.The most common approach that I have seen used is the appeal to our common goal of successfully completing the mission. I have had to work with many individuals whom I just could not come to a mutual understanding with. This conflict may have been caused by a personal difference, a different celestial horizon of how to perform the mission, or even how to utilize our forces. In the end, we have to put on that to continue with this conflict means jeopardizing your common goal of accomplishing the mission. This may pass in a lose-lose conflict where both partys had to compromise their positions in order to secure success.Collaboration, authoritative, accommodation, and compromise are conflict management styles that I have used and seen used on an almost free-and-easy basis. It really depends on the person and whom that person has the conflict with. It may be that the individuals themselves do not have a conflict, but that a system has been emplaced that is causing their conflict.Avoidance is a management style that I do not see a lot of. When it does rear its nasty head, it is at the lower levels of the organi zation. It is usually there because the individual thinks that it is not a unplayful problem and his time would be better utilized doing something more productive. This train of thought usually leads him to a path of discord because the conflict impart snow ball into a larger problem that has become visible to his superiors.The two conflict management styles that I myself am prone to are competing and collaborating. I am very aggressive in my views and will surmount byforce if I need to. I am overly very attune to recognizing that there is a problem or a conflict may arise because of circumstances of an issue. I am not locked into the two styles though. They are just my natural trends. I am very quick to analyze a situation or individual to take what course I will take to get the maximum potentiality from. The end goal is the objective. How I get there can be adjusted according to situational awareness.Works CitedSmith, S. Stephenson, et al, ed. Webster Comprehensive Dictionar y International Edition. dough Ferguson, 1987.