The Mentally Ill Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

The Mentally paraplegic - Essay ExampleThe Mentally Ill A. Journal Writings I am a psychiatric nurse from a local company hospital and was taking care of patient of X ( non the real name to protect confidentiality of patient information). patient role X was diagnosed with schizophrenia and was treated with clozapine (Clozaril), an atypical psychotropic drug used to treat psychotic symptoms, hallucinations, and breaks with reality (NIMH, 2012, 6). For a period of four weeks, I usually give Patient X a 200 mg oral preparations of clozapine twice a day as ordered. After serial publication of inpatient medication regimen, Patient Xs symptoms of schizophrenia decreased and the patient is now stabilized. With this, Patient X requested to be pocketd and be treated through outpatient loading. I told Patient X that I will relay his request to the health care team and will inform him of the decisiveness made. Upon discussing it with the health care team, we were put in a dilemma whether to grant Patient Xs request to respect his autonomy and independence or denied it to uphold the principle of nonmaleficence because the client might not take medications on time or not take medications at all and may return to an imminent threat or danger to self or to others due to relapse of schizophrenic symptoms. In addition, putting Patient X, who is receiving clozapine, on an outpatient commitment may present a serious harm as a WBC check every week or two is necessary to avoid fact of agranulocytosis or loss of the white blood cells that help a person fight infection. B. good Dilemma In responding to a psychiatric patients request of discharge and treatment on an outpatient commitment, which ethical and legal principle should be considered the legal right of a patient and the ethical principle of autonomy and independence or the professional responsibility of the nurse to do no harm and work out paternalism? C. Ethics Paper Summaries. Elbogen and Tomkins authored the ar ticle entitled From the Psychiatric Hospital to the Community Integrating Conditional ex one(a)rate and Contingency Management in 2000. The article proposed involuntary outpatient commitment with therapeutic jurisdiction as one possible solution for psychiatric recidivism in the community. The article also emphasized that clinicians find it hard to discharge patients and are often put in a dilemma whether the discharge decision will expediency the patient or will end up in a relapse of chronic kind illness. In addition, discharge from the psychiatric hospitals also corresponds in legal status changes which might predispose the exclusive to heightened stress and independent living (Elbogen & Tomkins, 2000, 428). Thus, the article had raised a question whether outpatient commitment can offer up continuity of care and reduce incidence of rehospitalization. Elbogen & Tomkins (2011) found therapeutic jurisprudence framework as the unwrap to analyze legal and beneficial mental healt h interventions for the individual, conflicting values, and generated or implemented laws, policies and practice (p. 429). In patients with chronic mental illness, therapeutic jurisprudence preferred a discharge plan that maximizes convergence among self-determination, individual well-being, and public safety through integration of risk assessment technology and effective rehabilitative treatment, particularly contingency management. Absolute discharge might be the best promoter of self-determination as there are no strings attached however it predisposed the patient for rehospitalization unlike outpatient commitment that discharged patient with therapeutic jurisprudence and reduced incidence of reho